Letter
from America
October
22, 2007
Given the
destitute life that afflicts the vast majority of the population,
one can understand why most Zimbabweans pay little or no attention
to the wholesale destruction of the ecosystem.
Zimbabweans are going through one of the worst living conditions
in living memory as a result of the disastrous socio-economic
policies of the dictatorial regime of Robert Mugabe.
Life
expectancy among the Zimbabweans has in less than a decade been
slashed by nearly half to just 34 years for women and 37 years for
men.
If
Zimbabweans are experiencing such unprecedented neglect, oppression
and degradation of their human dignity by the Mugabe regime one can
well imagine what the situation must be in the case of the
environment and wild life.
The
invasion and destruction of commercial agriculture seven years ago
by thugs acting under the orders of Mugabe marked the beginning
of a wholesale destruction of the ecosystem in Zimbabwe.
And in a
space of seven years 70 percent of commercial agriculture has been
destroyed, resulting in widespread famine that will affect an
estimated four million Zimbabweans next year.
Parallel
to this massive humanitarian crisis that Mugabe has created has been
a systematic destruction of the environment. It is estimated that 78
percent of the wild life on commercial farms has been decimated.
Poaching is rampant. Top cronies in the Mugabe regime are
involved, leading to a state of anarchy in game conservation. There
are no viable policies on the environment and wildlife. Zimbabwe’s
national herd, which totalled 1.4 million animals in 2000,has
virtually been depleted with fewer than 125,000 animals surviving.
The
greatest irony was the appointment last year of Zimbabwe’s minister
of the environment, Francis Nhema, to head the United Nations
commission on sustainable development.
The
environment has also been severely affected by Mugabe’s politically
motivated and misguided policies resulting in the pollution of the
country’s major dams, the so-called Operation Murambatsvina which
involved the wanton destruction of people’s homes, rendering nearly
one million Zimbabweans homeless. The inability to generate enough
energy resulting in massive power cuts led many Zimbabweans to
cutting down trees for firewood used for cooking meals.
Yet
Zimbabwe’s long-term sustainable development will necessarily rely
on a well managed ecosystem.
Sustainable development is a critical element in the process of
social reproduction, a process by which successive generations rely
on for survival.
The
United Nations commission on sustainable development has mapped out
core indicators for sustainable development. Among these are
poverty reduction, economic
development, good governance, health, land consumption and
production patterns
education
,demographics, freshwater and biodiversity. In all of these
indicators Zimbabwe has a very poor record.
Sustainable development has been described as “ development that
meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their own needs.”
The
Mugabe regime has, by the wanton and barbaric destruction of the
ecosystem in Zimbabwe, shown a callous disregard that the same
ecosystem must support future generations as well. For Mugabe, who
is 84 years old, there is no future , let alone present, generation
to think about. All he and his cronies care about is his personal
political survival.
Yet the
preservation and proper management of the ecosystem must be
activated as a matter of urgency.
With the
regime having absconded from its responsibilities on ecosystem
management the torch passes on to civil society and NGOs who are
doing their best to preserve the environment, but under very
oppressive conditions created by the Mugabe regime.
The
secretary for natural resources, tourism and the environment in the
opposition Movement for Democratic Change, Gertrude Mtombeni
recently spoke in an interview about her vision for ecosystem
management should the MDC become the new government in post-
Mugabe Zimbabwe.
MDC is
still formulating its policy on the environment. Mtombeni was,
however, very clear about what she perceived as her
responsibilities should she hold this position. The cornerstone of
her vision is a partnership of all stakeholders in a collective
effort to conserve the ecosystem.
Right
from the very first day MDC will become government it will be faced
with an avalanche of demands to save the environment. Whether she
will, in fact be the Minister in charge of the ecosystem
management Mtombeni knows that she has an immediate task of
articulating MDC’s ecosystem policy so that the Tsvangirai
administration will have a strategic plan that can be implemented
almost immediately.
But
Mtombeni does not have much time. If the current negotiations
between MDC and ZANUPF are successfully concluded, elections could
be held on their scheduled date in march next year. All things
being equal, and if the elections are free and fair MDC’s victory
is almost assured. This means the day after the MDC government is
sworn in Mtombeni will be the point person for the new
government’s environmental policy.
But the
ecosystem is a sum total of the development indicators outlined
by the commission on sustainable development. This will mean that
ecosystem management will become a collective responsibility among
the ministries and between government and the civil society and
NGOs.
Earlier I
said Zimbabweans can be excused for not paying much attention to
the degradation of the environment by the Mugabe regime. Grinding
poverty has transformed Zimbabwe into a nation perpetually in an
uphill struggle to survive from one day to the next .
But
neglect of the environment is not an option for Zimbabweans. The
ecosystem is Zimbabweans’ lifeline.
What is
needed now is for civil society and the MDC to join hands in a
concerted effort to save the environment. Saving the environment is
tantamount to saving Zimbabwe.
The
biggest challenge for Mtombeni is to create among the Zimbabweans
the ecological consciousness and conscience. Many Zimbabweans tend
to take the environment for granted. As a result they do not realize
they have a strategic role in conserving the ecosystem.
Zimbabweans, through the civil society and MDC leadership, must be
educated and mobilized to take part in a massive rescue effort for
the environment.
One very
simple activity every Zimbabwean should undertake to do is tree
planting. The cyclical drought conditions may mean some of the
trees will not grow or will wither. But Zimbabweans will have made
a start in this long road toward reforestation.
By
mobilizing a grassroots effort toward ecosystem conservation civil
society can effect significant changes in the long term.
Even as
civil society is involved in a political struggle against Mugabe
Zimbabweans must define the environment as part of that struggle.