Letter
from America
June 4,
2007
Strategies for mass action
While Zimbabweans appear on the surface docile and fearful, there can be no
telling what will ultimately trigger that built- in anger which has been
rising for the past seven years.
.
But before any strategy for mass action can be undertaken it is important to
define the enemy, for that is what Mugabe has become in as far as ordinary
Zimbabweans are concerned.
What are Mugabe’s strengths? What are his weaknesses? People who watched the
TV Star Trek series will have noticed that each time the Star Trek
team encountered an unknown and potentially hostile force the ship’s first
officer Mr. Spock always used his computer scanners to try to identify the
source of the force’s energy and power. Once it had been identified the
next task was to work out strategies to destroy it.
In
the same vein Mugabe’s strengths and weaknesses must be identified.
In
terms of strength Mugabe now relies very heavily on the military to protect
him. But what about his weaknesses? For one, the economy is Mugabe’s
Achilles’ Heel. And it is the economy that sustains the army. With the
economy in a tailspin there is a likelihood this will undermine the army
which is reported to be losing thousands of soldiers through resignations. A
campaign on the economic front, like targeting companies that supply
military equipment to Mugabe’s army could seriously erode the army’s
ability to maintain its strength at the level that can comfortably protect
Mugabe and his cronies.
A
combination of factors can potentially trigger the outburst of that anger
among Zimbabweans .
The
first and most important is that it is anyone’s guess which of the actions
by Mugabe, now or in future, could be the spark that set off the anger
dynamite within the people. This is what Mugabe fears the most. In some
cases Mugabe is like a child playing with fire in a explosives shop. Nobody
can tell for sure at what point that fire will set off the fireworks.
The
second is a series of civil disobedience campaigns involving small but
effective groups. This is more or less what is happening now in which the
Women of Zimbabwe Arise WOZA, the NCA and student organizations have
started all kinds of political brush fires.
What is particularly significant about these acts of civil disobedience is
if they are sustained they will grow into a national uprising, especially if
they are spread throughout the country. WOZA has been particularly
effective in their campaigns because they touch on the bread and butter
issues that affect the ordinary women and households. The student
organization is also gaining momentum because they have focused on the
deteriorating standards and conditions of their education.
There is another dimension of the civil disobedience campaign. It involves a
far wider network of agitators than those in formal or informal groups like
WOZA and MDC. Here, one is looking at the strengths Zimbabweans in
influential positions can mobilize.
A
French philosopher once said information is power. In today’s information
age those who possess the means of communication and information
gathering have infinitely more power and influence than those with arms of
war.
The
task here would be look at the sources of strength of the Mugabe regime. Who
supplies the arms of war to this regime? What companies, specifically, are
trading arms with Mugabe? Who are Mugabe’s bankers? In what companies have
Mugabe and his cronies invested their money and other resources? Where do
Mugabe and his cronies send their children to school abroad?
But
more importantly, what are the names and addresses of the thugs who have
tortured, killed, maimed and raped innocent Zimbabweans?
For
each question above someone somewhere inside or outside Zimbabwe has the
capability to access information.
I
once met a Zimbabwean a few years who said he had worked in the then PTC
and was in the unit that maintained secure lines of telecommunication
among Mugabe and his top military people. He revealed shocking information
about what Mugabe said and to whom. In that information was clear evidence
of Mugabe plotting with some of his top leadership to kill an opposition
supporter.
There are now effective monitoring systems that can retrieve this
information in the interest of the human rights campaign against the brutal
dictatorship of Mugabe.
On
the diplomatic front the success MDC achieved in lobbying the African Union
parliamentarians is a text book case of how mobilizing the international
community can be an effective aspect of mass action.
The Zimbabwean Diaspora community has a critical role in the multifaceted
strategy of mass action. They can mobilize the resources and an information
campaign to discredit any of Mugabe’s cronies who may be visiting their
areas.
The
Zimbabweans in Diaspora must establish a research unit that will
investigate organizations and institutions that support Mugabe. If the
names of these organizations could be revealed and details of their
operations that support Mugabe widely publicized on the Internet the
institutions or companies would have a major public relations disaster on
their hands.
Many farms and companies that were seized by Mugabe’s cronies are doing a
roaring business abroad. The research unit of the Zimbabweans in Diaspora
could expose such companies and let members of the public know the sources
of some of the produce they buy at their local supermarkets.
If
there is a network of Zimbabweans in Diaspora who will share this
information then the institutions and companies that are bankrolling the
Mugabe regime will be widely publicized.
Military might has not made Mugabe stronger. He suffers from insecurity,
hence he travels in convoys of up to 30 cars sometimes and a heavy military
escort.
There is talk that Mugabe is no longer in control and the military chiefs
are the ones who effectively run the country. There is credibility to this
because his cronies and security people are painfully aware that , at the
age of 83, Mugabe is living on borrowed time and anything can happen to his
health. It may well be that some of them are probably clandestinely
negotiating with the opposition movement in order to guarantee their
security in the post- Mugabe Zimbabwe.
Even a sizable chunk of Mugabe’s supporters know that ZANUPF and whatever
it stands for is now a lost cause in Zimbabwe. The so-looked East policy,
the promised aid from China, the farm invasions and other half baked
measures to try to control the runaway inflation have not brought the
desired results to the country.
ZANUPF
cronies who seized farms and other businesses have failed dismally to make
them productive.
The economy has shrunk by over 40 percent. Over 500 businesses have shut
down and or migrated to other countries where there is a better investment
climate.
These are some of Mugabe’s weak points that the opposition movement should
analyze for the purposes of evolving new and more effective strategies for
mass action.
Mugabe is in what Gramsci once called an organic crisis. The institutions
of the state that he controls are now being threatened left, right and
center. In this unstable situation Mugabe’s survival is on the line.
Faced with this untenable situation Mugabe has now drawn a laager
around him and is mobilizing all the forces at his command to lash out. His
brutal assaults on the opposition members is symptomatic of this state of an
organic crisis. Like a cornered animal, Mugabe is determined to fight
using whatever means at his disposal. But that does not make him
indefinitely superior because he has limited resources to sustain his
oppressive rule for ever.
But what are the chances of Zimbabweans actually assembling in thousands
and marching to the State House to bring popular pressure to bear on
Mugabe?
If
we were to put together all the challenges I mentioned earlier that Mugabe
is facing today, they could collectively constitute a form of civil
disobedience or protest, a variant of mass protest. As long as those
challenges remain they will gradually wear out Mugabe who has another
battle on his hands at the age of 83.
Secondly as long as Mugabe genuinely fears a mass uprising, the challenges
of a runaway inflation, a decadent economy and a general deterioration of
socioeconomic conditions in the country will force him eventually to concede
defeat by an early exit from politics.
To
this extent the Zimbabweans may not need to actually march on the streets.
What is important is they show Mugabe in no uncertain terms that they have
the motive, the will power and the intention to stage a mass demonstration.
A sense of logic and maturity will dawn at last on Mugabe.
They are reports that Mugabe has seen the light and might be preparing an
exit at some undetermined but very near future.