The
Voice for Democracy’s message to the MDC, SADC and the Friends of Zimbabwe
on
the First Anniversary of the Inclusive Government
Speaking Truth to Power
LET THE JURY OF THE PEOPLE DECIDE
The MDC did not
enter into a marriage of convenience, but one of abuse. For all its
goodwill, compromises and appeasement, the MDC has been repaid with
contempt, provocations and lawlessness. Robert Mugabe has not just been
reluctant to implement the provisions of the GPA, he has deliberately set
out to sabotage and destroy it. Yet, even as he flexed his muscles and
hurled abuse, a battered and deeply compromised MDC smiled for the cameras,
vowing never to leave its faithless partner. The Prime Minister soothed the
worries of the Friends of Zimbabwe, reassuring them that its rocky marriage
was still working, that Robert Mugabe was part of the solution, and that
their marriage – the Inclusive Government – should be blessed by the removal
of sanctions and rewarded with development aid for its achievements.
The diplomatic
dilemma
Having won the
March 2008 elections, the MDC surrendered wide presidential powers to the
very man, Robert Mugabe, who had brought nothing but violence, ruin and
misery to the people of Zimbabwe – and left Western diplomats groping for an
adequate response. How are the Friends of Zimbabwe to reward the MDC for its
efforts to bring peace and recovery while pressuring Mugabe to restore human
rights and the rule of law under the GPA? How can they provide development
aid to the MDC while maintaining sanctions on Mugabe and ZANU(PF)? In truth,
they cannot. The MDC and ZANU(PF) forged an Inclusive Government in which
they became two sides of the same coin.
The International
Crisis Group’s sanguine belief that increased development aid would reward
the moderates while isolating the hardliners was always illusionary. As long
as Mugabe maintains his grip on power, any attempts to increase development
aid or foster trade and investment will inevitably be captured by ZANU(PF).
Similarly, any development aid or the lifting of sanctions to reward the
Inclusive Government for achieving a modicum of economic stability will send
an unmistakable message to Mugabe: that he and his supporters will not be
held accountable for continued human rights violations and their disregard
for the rule of law. Their very impunity will be rewarded.
This conundrum for
Western powers is now being played out within the EU. Divisions have emerged
between Germany and the Denmark that want sanctions eased and Britain and
the Netherlands that want them maintained. The expectation is that they will
reach a tepid compromise and again urge the Zimbabwean parties to implement
the GPA in full. Whatever their decision, the EU and the MDC should disabuse
themselves of any hope that easing sanctions will coax Mugabe into meeting
his GPA commitments. There is none.
Western donor
countries face similar contradictions in their diplomatic relations with
SADC and the African Union, which have repeatedly supported the Inclusive
Government’s call for the lifting of limited sanctions and the resumption of
development aid. How then do Western governments align themselves to the
policies of African countries when SADC, as the guarantor of the GPA, has
proved unable to enforce its provisions? Indeed, how can the donors align
themselves to SADC decisions when the underlying reasons for imposing
targeted sanctions in the first place remain unresolved? The question is:
how can the Friends of Zimbabwe extricate themselves from these diplomatic
dilemmas and realign their policies with SADC and the African Union?
International
realignment behind a democratic transition
The first is to
face the facts. The international donor community should resist repeating
the tired mantra that the parties must implement the GPA in full. The
self-evident fact is that the GPA is dead in letter and spirit. Second, they
should listen carefully to the voices for democracy. When
the MDC disengaged from their ‘dishonest and unreliable partner’ in October
2009, Morgan Tsvangirai said that the obvious solution would be the holding
of a free and fair election to be conducted by SADC and the AU and under UN
supervision. As Mugabe still refuses to comply with the GPA, Tsvangirai now
says that the only solution is to agree on a road map to an election.
This presents the international donor
community with an ideal opportunity to realign itself with the MDC’s
democratic principles and with key advocates of a democratic transition
within SADC, notably President Khama of Botswana. Given South Africa’s
frustration over the painfully slow implementation of the GPA, diplomatic
efforts should be redirected towards convincing an increasingly impatient
President Zuma that elections provide a compelling alternative to the GPA.
It would not only bring finality to a festering regional problem, but it
would enable Zimbabwe’s full reengagement with the international community.
Almost immediately, targeted sanctions could be lifted, debts rescheduled,
and international development aid resumed. Crucially, it would bring the
international community’s policy towards Zimbabwe into alignment with those
of the SADC countries.
The Responsibility to Protect
Yet, for all the possibilities of democratic
elections bringing peace, recovery and growth to Zimbabwe, there stands
Robert Mugabe, ready to unleash his dreaded state security and militia on
any who dare challenge his self-proclaimed right to rule. And here the
Friends of Zimbabwe should heed the words of Finance Minister and the MDC
General Secretary, Tendai Biti, when he called for the “holding of free and
fair elections under the protection and supervision of SADC to
ensure that the dreams of the people are never again dashed nor denied.”
Unless the citizens of Zimbabwe are protected to cast their ballots
in peace and security there can be no guarantee of free and fair elections:
not now, not when we have a new constitution, nor in 3 or 5 years hence.
Gareth Evans,
President of the International Crisis Group, has been the boldest advocate
of the international community’s responsibility to protect citizens
who are threatened with crimes against humanity by their own state. Having
realigned themselves behind a democratic transition, western donors and SADC
countries should immediately start building a ‘Coalition for the
Responsibility to Protect’ that allow Zimbabwean voters to cast their
ballots in peace and security during the next election.
The Open Society
Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA) has already called for the immediate
deployment of a SADC delegation to secure an end to political violence.
Theirs is an urgent appeal for a
comprehensive, standing
presence of SADC to be stationed in Zimbabwe until the draft Constitution
has been submitted to a referendum and that free and fair presidential and
legislative elections have been held. The Voice for Democracy has gone
further. We have called for this security presence to be in place until
there has been an incontrovertible and peaceful handover of power to the
winners of the next election.
We the Jury 
The MDC has bravely endured
endless public humiliations by its arrogant and abusive partner. It must now
drop any pretence that its marriage is working and file for divorce by
taking its case to SADC and the international community for adjudication,
who must let the jury – the people of Zimbabwe – decide on its own leaders
through free and fair elections. Therein lies our hope, dignity and freedom.
Wednesday 11 February 2010
Mugabe and ZANU latest criminal act
13,000 ZANU thugs on
government payroll
MDC Statement: Zanu PF’s Indigenisation Bill unacceptable criminality
The MDC dismisses the clandestine and nicodemous gazetting of regulations
calling for all foreign investors to cede 51 percent of their investment to
‘indigenous people.’
Minister Saviour Kasukuwere, whose ministry is yet to explain how it
illegally foisted 13 000 Zanu PF youths on the government payroll, has
decided to rail-road controversial, anti-investment regulations without the
knowledge of Cabinet and the Head of Government, the Prime Minister.
It is simply a unilateral Zanu PF Bill which has failed to meet not only the
basic components of procedure, but has far reaching negative and dire
consequences on the much-needed investment in Zimbabwe.
The MDC views these provocative and anti-investment regulations as a
deliberate attempt to undermine the country and its people. At a time when
Zimbabwe desperately needs foreign direct investment, it is an affront to
recovery efforts for the Ministry of Youth and Indigenisation to nocturnally
and unilaterally gazette these anti-people and anti-Zimbabwe regulations.
Zanu PF simply wants to create a new arena for looting and abuse. The
so-called “indigenous people” who are set to benefit from this criminal Bill
are not the ordinary man and woman, but the well-connected elite and the
Zanu PF chefs.
The people of Zimbabwe want real change. They want hope, security, dignity,
freedom and prosperity. They want investment so that they can have jobs,
food, better health care and education. They want real change yesterday and
not cheap politics meant to extinguish hope and undermine the inclusive
government.
The MDC calls upon the inclusive government, in the national interest, to
reverse all such destructive
WOZA release report on state of democracy in Zimbabwe one year after
formation of GNU
In 2009,
WOZA started discussions on what we think the building blocks of democracy
are with over 11,000 members, urban and rural, through workshops and a
booklet -
Building
democracy with WOZA.
The objective was to raise awareness that Zimbabwe needs a democratic form
of government committed to making sure that all the building blocks of
democracy are in place for all citizens to enjoy social justice.
As 2009
closed, we conducted a further consultation of the state of our democracy
after the formation of the Government of National Unity (GNU) in February
2009. 4,016 people gave us their views. The results have been released in a
report entitled,
‘Hearts
starve as well as bodies - give us bread but give us roses too!
Democratising Zimbabwe - an opportunity to shine! A WOZA perspective on the
state of democracy in Zimbabwe.’
The report is a snapshot of our community activists’ views on the state of
democracy in Zimbabwe one year after the GNU was formed.
The main
findings of the report include:
-
The
belief that the power-sharing government has decreased democratic space
in Zimbabwe.
-
There
has been some change for those who are rich but for the poor nothing has
changed. It has remained survival of the fittest. The dollarisation of
the economy stabilised prices and the economy in general but the gap
between rich and poor widened.
-
Many
expressed no confidence in an election before the constitutional process
is complete.
-
People
want to give their views and write their own constitution but worry that
the current consultation process has too many loopholes that can be
manipulated to change their views into those wanted by politicians.
-
Most
agree that they believe that public funds should go through the Ministry
of Finance but the Minister must also be transparent about what he does
with it.
-
The
personal security situation for ordinary people is still very insecure.
-
Most
people polled believe that the rule of law in the country has worsened.
The report
also contains a list of steps that WOZA, the mothers of the nation, would
like to see before we can believe that democracy is alive and well in
Zimbabwe. These include:
1.
Elections
- Before the referendum, we need to have confidence that a voter’s roll will
be transparently prepared and displayed for viewing. We need a truly
independent electoral commission.
2.
Opposition
- we need to see democracy in action - a genuine welcoming of different
political voices.
3.
Civil rights
- we are citizens with rights and must be allowed to enjoy all our rights
without fear or harassment. We look forward to the passing of the bill
amending POSA. We need to see the promised security sector reform with
special attention on police reform because it is police who abuse our rights
on a daily basis.
4.
Rule of law
- start to prosecute perpetrators of politically motivated violence urgently
- everyone must obey the law or be punished.
5.
Separation
of powers
- The presidential appointment of Tomana and Gono has resulted in a further
mixing up of the functions of government. For judicial reform, Tomana and
other political appointees in the Attorney General’s office must go and be
replaced by professional people who will balance the scales of our justice
system.
6.
Equality
- we are writing this into our new constitution. Please Parliamentary Select
Committee do not betray this ideal by cheating us when we give you our
views.
7.
Transparency
and accountability
- As long as we have a politically partisan Reserve Bank governor, there
will be no investor confidence, jobs will not be available and workers
receive a living wage - therefore Gono must go. Minister Tendai Biti, we
need more transparency and accountability from you. Studying your strategy
from the trenches, it looks like you want to squeeze money out of poor
people’s pockets to fund the recovery. You need to do better to cushion the
poor! You must stop the police from criminalizing informal traders. Please
don’t forget about the children’s education, they are our future.
8.
Participation of the people
- our report is called hearts starve as well as bodies - give us bread but
give us roses too! We want our ‘rose’, which is our own constitution! Allow
a genuine people-driven process for the constitutional consultation for our
full participation. Disband militia camps and let our children come home.
The police must stop arresting people without good reason; police officers
are crucial to allowing people to feel free. To the three principals, you
promised us a “society
free of violence, fear, intimidation, hate, patronage, corruption and
founded on justice, fairness, openness, transparency, dignity and equality.”
Now it is time to deliver on what you promised